HOMEBioFilm rights, Screenplays, Representation2021 Commentaries2020 CommentariesOLYMPIC AFFAIR: HITLER'S SIREN AND AMERICA'S HEROTHE WITCH'S SEASONThird Down and a War to GoHORNS, HOGS, AND NIXON COMING'77: DENVER, THE BRONCOS, AND A COMING OF AGEMarch 1939: Before the MadnessPLAYING PIANO IN A BROTHELSave By RoyThey Call Me "Mr. De": The Story of Columbine's Heart, Resilience and RecoveryA Selection of Terry Frei's writing about World War II heroesOlympic Affair Excerpt: Chapter 1, Leni's VisitOlympic Affair Excerpt: Chapter 15, Aren't You Thomas Wolfe?The Witch's Season: Screenplay opening pagesThe Witch's Season Excerpt:Air Force Game, Bitter Protest, a Single ShotThird Down and a War to Go: Screenplay opening pagesThird Down and a War to Go Excerpt: Ohio State vs. WisconsinThird Down and a War to Go genesis: Grateful for the Guard, Jerry FreiHorns, Hogs, and Nixon Coming: Prologue and screenplay opening pagesHorns, Hogs, and Nixon Coming Excerpt: James Street: Wishbone WizardHorns, Hogs, and Nixon Coming Subplot: The day they stopped playing Dixie'77 Excerpt: AFC Title GameMarch 1939 Excerpt: First NCAA Title GameMarch 1939, Excerpt: The StartersPlaying Piano Excerpt: S.F. EarthquakeAdditional Terry Frei Commentaries on WoodyPaige.comPress CredentialsThe Sporting NewsDenver PostESPN.comThe OregonianGreeley TribuneKids' sports books: The ClassicsJon Hassler, Terry Kay and other favorite novelistsBig Bill Ficke's Big HeartBob Bell's Food For Thought



November 5, 2020 




It's liberalism's Achilles'.


Im speaking of the desire to be labeled, above all, "sensitive."

Often, it's just flat-out timidity.

Regardless, we fail to call out extremists and the actions of a relative few for whom this becomes more about opportunism than expression.     


I use the collective "we" because I'm a traditional liberal Democrat by most standards.Those include youthful activism, voting past and philosophy. 

By 2020, though, that comes with a rejection of kneejerk Political Correctness. Also, it's not betraying progressive ideals to judge issues on a case-by-case basis with an open mind and when it's called for, the nerve to say, "Whoa ..."

In this case, we didn't sufficiently condemn and disavow over-the-top conduct that went beyond and unfortunately detracted from heartfelt and justified social justice protests and messages.   


It was a factor in the perfect storm that almost saved President Trump's job. 


The results -- and the analysis of the results -- illustrate how crucial micro-blocs can be. State-by-state, coast-to-coast. 

I am absolutely convinced there are enough centrists or conservatives who might have voted for the Biden-Harris ticket to have transformed the race into what passes for a rout in national electoral politics. 

I know some of them. 

Many of them concede Trump's foibles. All of them. They wince at them.

Which brings me to this: It was, and is, another misjudgment to write off all Trump voters as blind followers, or being in complete denial.

I'll concede it's difficult for me to fathom why or how anyone could support him -- the man, not the party's candidate -- but that's for individual consciences to tackle.  


I believe there ultimately was a bloc turned off by Liberalism's failure to sufficiently condemn the violence and destruction that accompanied or followed those legitimate demonstrations and protests.

I'm saying there was a chance that enough of them would have voted for Biden otherwise. 


But the excesses -- albeit coming from many with murky motives -- disgusted and, yes, scared those potential Biden voters. 

So did liberals' fear of offending anyone to their left by calling out those involved. 


How many of those potential Biden voters were there?


I don't have an exact answer. I'm guessing that as in 2016, many of them were self-conscious about their choice, even to the point of being less than straightforward with pollsters.  (Don't think so? How can the pollsters be so wrong twice in four years?)


But I'll say the number would have been enough to transform Biden vs. Trump from a prolonged nail-biter, albeit under Electoral College ground rules, to a result called four days after Election Night.   


Absolutely, both Biden and Harris said something along those lines during the campaign. More than once. Maybe even often. But not often enough. 

Not often enough to sufficiently address the disgust and fears, both tapped in Trump speeches and ads. 

Not often enough to shoot down the fallacy that the Democratic ticket specifically and party in general was pandering to extremism. 

And how many of those eloquently and sincerely opining about social justice issues in these troubled times seemed to be invoking a careful protocol and following a "sensitivity" template? Or excusing the excesses?


If stridently denouncing the violence and destruction offended anyone on the far left, so what? What were they going to do? Vote for Trump?       


And where the Trump supporters had a point was hearing criticism of, say, a Sturgis motorcycle rally because of the lack of masks and social distancing, and a disregard for crowd size limits, then noticing those same critics excused defiance of COVID-19 protocol at social justice protests. 

Where the Trump followers did not have a point is when what sure looked like armed storm troopers attempting to intimidate while expressing support for Trump and defying COVID-19 protocol. Also, Trump's failure to call out white supremacists was disgusting. But that's secondary to the issue of how all of this prevented buyer's regret tied to Trump's conduct. 


The lack of decisive denunciation of the violence and destruction scared off -- or drove off or kept away -- many potential Biden voters. They were out there among the relatively reasonable Trump supporters. 


Liberals. We need to look in the mirror on that. 



A sign in our neighborhood leading up to the election